News reports have been reminding us on a regular basis that the Pentagon
is limiting the support it provides to allies. European countries need to
listen to President Trump and take defence more seriously, especially
cybersecurity.
My advice to
Dr Amandine "cryptie" Jambert is quite simple: if she wants to help
Europe face the challenges ahead, she needs to admit she was fooled
by the
FSFE misfits. More importantly, she needs to apologize to those
people she fooled and recruited to join the same scam.
If
Jambert feels bad, it's not because of
harassment. It is because she was fooled and she has been used so
effectively to fool others too. To clear her conscience, she needs to own
up to that and apologize.
If she can't make this admission and apology in her own personal
context, how can she be effective in her role as an expert in an
office of the European Commission?
From the
Catechism, paragraph 1847:
1847. "God created us without us: but he did not will to save us without us." To receive his mercy, we must admit our faults. "If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just, and will forgive our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness."
1849 Sin is an offense against reason, truth, and right conscience; it is failure in genuine love for God and neighbor caused by a perverse attachment to certain goods. It wounds the nature of man and injures human solidarity. It has been defined as "an utterance, a deed, or a desire contrary to the eternal law."
What this tells us is that
Jambert is unable to admit that she was fooled by the
FSFE misfits because of her ego. Ego is frequently a factor in
sinful behaviour.
The catechism goes on
1859 Mortal sin requires full knowledge and complete consent. It presupposes knowledge of the sinful character of the act, of its opposition to God's law. It also implies a consent sufficiently deliberate to be a personal choice. Feigned ignorance and hardness of heart do not diminish, but rather increase, the voluntary character of a sin.
What this tells us is that when
Jambert and I both became aware of the FSF/FSFE deception in 2017, our
continued participation with full knowledge and complete consent would have
become mortal sin. I understood and I quickly resigned. Why didn't
Jambert?
Subject: FSF asking us to change our name II
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 08:39:00 +0000
From: Matthias Kirschner <mk@fsfe.org>
To: ga@fsfeurope.org
Dear members,
as we wrote in our last mail we have again been approached by the FSF to
change our name. Below there is a summary of the situation as well as
the proposed next steps. Please let us know if you have any questions.
It is longer than I wished for, but we had several new people join the
GA since the last time we discussed this.
...
Look at the consequences for people who have been fooled by the
FSFE misfits.
Subject: Re: Financial results 2016 online
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 23:11:46 +0200
From: Reinhard Müller <reinhard@fsfe.org>
Organization: Free Software Foundation Europe
To: team@lists.fsfe.org
Hi, Max!
Am 2017-05-23 um 22:37 schrieb Max Mehl:
> This seems to be the first year
> with a turnover of more than 1 million Euros, right?
Not quite, at least not for my definition of the word "turnover" 🙂. It
would be more like 650k (the income), which is still the highest value
we ever had.
> It seems the non-Fellowship-donations have increased by more than 80%
> (which is a remarkable number!). Could you please elaborate why this is
> the case? Have there been single huge donations, or rather multiple
> medium donations? Are they connected to our legal work or something
> else?
In 2016, we received a significant sum from an inheritance where FSFE
was the principal heir. The deceased person stated very clearly in the
last will that FSFE is expected to not make much noise around this, and
we of course respected this.
We also received a significant one-time donation from Lars P Mathiassen
who is listed on our ThankGNUs page anyway.
...
These people ask us to trust them on serious issues such as electronic
payments facilitated by
blockchain and
cryptocurrency. How can we trust
Jambert's advice on those topics if she can't even recognize the
confusion between FSF and the
fake FSFE misfits?
Dr Amandine "cryptie" Jambert has a PhD in cryptography and a safe
government job, previously at CNIL and now at the European Data
Protection Board (EDPB).
What on earth is the motive for this woman and some associates to lie and
attack my family when my father died?
Out of coincidence,
Pierre-Elliott Bécue, of the French military
cybersecurity office ANSSI obtained his PhD at the same university as
Jambert only ten years later. Like
Jambert,
Bécue has also been observed attacking my family at the time when
my father died and immediately after the conviction of the late
Cardinal George Pell.
The previous blog
went over the history of the lies, making it clear that Jambert has always
had conflicts of interest.
Nonetheless, for any crime, it is always important to look at the motive
in some detail.
Cryptography, in general, hopes to solve two main problems. Firstly,
you want to make sure that messages are protected from eavesdropping. We
call that encryption. Secondly, you want to make sure the person at the
other end of the communications channel really is who they claim to be,
that is authentication.
We often use the fictional characters Alice, Bob, Eve and Mallory to
demonstrate these concepts with a diagram. Here, to help
Jambert see it in these terms, I've overlaid
Jambert,
the real Richard Stallman and the fake
FSFE president
Matthias Kirschner on top of Alice, Bob & Mallory.
In a technical sense, we have various ways to solve those encryption and
authentication problems using advanced mathematics. The mathematics isn't
important in this case.
Focus on the second part of the cryptography problem given above, the
importance of verifying the authenticity of the person or organization you
are corresponding with. In cryptography, our goal is to communicate with
the real Bob, or in this case,
the real Richard Stallman, founder of the
real FSF.
According
to my previous blog about Jambert's history, she was recruited to join
the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) misfits in 2012. Was she one of many
people who were fooled and believed we were joining the FSF and
Dr Richard Stallman?
Should an expert in authenticating people be able to tell the difference
between the FSF and the
FSFE at the moment she was fooled to join the
fake group,
FSFE?
For five years from 2012 to 2017,
Jambert may have been oblivious to the fact the
FSFE misfits are
not really part of the FSF. The FSF decided not to give a public
warning so it is understandable that many people remained in the dark.
Nonetheless, when this issue was brought to our attention in 2017,
in writing, we both became aware of it at the same time. Why was
Jambert unable to understand this was a serious problem of
identity/impersonation? People have communicated with, done voluntary work for
and given money to the fake
FSFE misfits believing it is a subsidiary or branch
of the real FSF. From 2017,
Jambert and I were both aware that people were being fooled.
I resigned from the
FSFE in disgust in September 2018.
Jambert stayed with the group until October 2023 and continues to
associate with them in various ways.
Jambert's inability to comprehend and respond to this problem of
authentication in the real world, even after I made public concerns
about it, casts doubt over her own professional competence and her
integrity. For example, in July 2018, she participated in the
promotional video at Strasbourg to help the Germans recruit more
French-speaking victims.
In parallel to this, we have the
JuristGate scandal in
Switzerland. For five years, the Swiss
financial regulator, FINMA, appeared to be contemplating whether the
company was a law office or an insurance office. During that time,
professionals from other insurance companies and
even a jurist from the Swiss police were fooled to quit their jobs and
come and work for the rogue firm.
Why was the regulator unable to recognize it for what it was?
Back to
Jambert, even if she doesn't care about being fooled by the
Nigerian fraud, her attacks on my family are utterly selfish.
As a member of the public service, why doesn't she take a moment to
think about all the other victims of the fraud? How does
Dr Richard Stallman feel when some other group is using his name
to collect money from the public?
Jambert's lie has a motive. It looks like she is a woman in denial
about her own incompetence, at least with respect to the FSF/FSFE dilemma,
on matters of integrity, identity and authentication. As these concepts
are fundamental to the practice of cryptography and e-commerce, she
is lying to avoid answering further questions about her collusion in
the FSF/FSFE deception.
As we are confronted with problems such as electronic cryptocurrency
payments and artificial-intelligence generated videos, it is more vital
than ever that professionals like
Jambert need to show the highest level of integrity. Before she can
help us with those challenges, she needs to come clean about the FSF/FSFE
dilemma.
Things like this happen all the time and when we detect it, we have
to be able to recognize what is going on and speak up. Look at the
fake security company, Crypto AG that operated for decades in
Switzerland. Now everybody knows it was really the CIA and BND.
It should be no big surprise that the
FSFE misfits are just another scam.
In 2022,
a woman from Lyon, France was tricked to quit the job she had held for
seven years and go to work for an illegal legal insurance company in
Geneva, Switzerland. Even the financial regulator, FINMA, knew about the
illegal legal insurance company
for up to five years but a series of tricks stopped them from
shutting it down earlier.
Look at the analogous case of
Dr Diana von Bidder-Senn, the mayor of Basel in
Switzerland. Like
Jambert,
Diana von Bidder-Senn has a PhD in
cybersecurity from the elite
ETH Zurich. Yet she was unable to recognize that her own husband was
being tricked by the
social engineering attacks that have corrupted
Debianism.
Subject: Re: condolences for Adrian
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:02:18 +0200
From: Diana von Bidder <diana@fortytwo.ch>
To: Stefano Zacchiroli <leader@debian.org>
Dear Stefano
Thank you for your wonderful mail! Yes Debian and people were very
important to Adrian. I was glad that he was not only sitting alone in
front of his computer but to know that there are people out there that
estimate him and are his friends even if most of you did not know each
other personally.
The way you describe him (empathy, calm, insight, ... - just the Adrian
I know) assures me on how good friends of Adrian are out there. And I
will always continue to think of this (in a good way!) when continuing
to use debian (which I became quite fond of because of Adrian).
It's a pity that he couldn't go to Banja Luca anymore which he did so
much look forward to. Anyway, I wish you all the best and hope you
continue your good work.
- Diana
Her husband,
Adrian von Bidder-Senn died on the very same day Carla and I got married.
There appear to be many known victims in the
Debian suicide cluster who were all tricked. They pretended that
Debianism is a family but that is a trick. Read the
detailed history of Adrian von Bidder-Senn's death on our wedding day.
comments? additions? reactions?
As always, comment on mastodon: https://fosstodon.org/@nirik/115991151489074594